One of the core tenants in Ayn Rand’s objectivism philosophy is in relation to use of force. The use of force should be reserved only for occasions where force has been used upon you. If your life is threatened by a gun, you should use a gun to defend you life. The problem is that, our society has taken it upon itself to limit the ability to defend ourselves when we are threatened by force.

In the wake of the Virginia Tech shootings, everyone seems to be shouting about new gun control. The re-introduction of the federal assault weapons ban has new momentum thanks to Carolyn McCarthy touring the talk shows and news programs speaking as if she was an authority on gun control, even though that bill would have had no impact on the shootings that took place. A new law has been introduced to close certain “loopholes” in the NCIC system for background checks. The new law would force doctors and other mental health professionals to hand over confidential mental health information to the government, in violation of our privacy. All of this is a vain attempt to tackle the problem by punishing the victims, and enabling the perpetrator.

Of course it is already illegal, even for concealed carry permit holders, to take a gun onto a college campus, but that didn’t stop Cho from doing it. The harder you make it to legally obtain a gun and to carry that gun in self-defense, the harder you are making it for victims to protect themselves. If just one of the staff members or students at Virginia Tech had been legally carrying a firearm, how many victims would there have been? I’m quite certain that it would have been less than the 32 that were killed, and 15 that were injured. It’s interesting to note that of the 14,000 concealed carry licenses issued in Oregon, only 4 individuals (0.03%) were convicted of criminal (though not necessarily violent) use or possession of a firearm. That rate is lower than the crime rate among police officers! The point is to say that carrying a gun does not make you a criminal, and the vast majority of those who do carry a gun do so in a safe and responsible manner.

As a society we need to wake up and realize that more laws, more protections, more limitations of our freedoms are never the answer. Our laws might not have caused Virginia Tech, but they enabled the perpetrator to take advantage of those of us who abide by the laws. Cho was able to kill far more individuals than he would have had these controls not existed. You can’t assume that someone who is capable of breaking the law and committing a crime like murder is going to be deterred by a lesser law like gun control or the inability to carry a weapon on campus.

This week, in response to the shootings, and out of fear of what kinds of laws might be passed in their wake, I’ve taken several steps to protect myself and my family. I’ve filed the required paper to obtain my concealed weapons (CCW) permit. I’ve purchased an additional sub-compact Glock 26 that will be my primary weapon for concealment, and I’ve purchased a AR-15 rifle in fear that it will soon become illegal to obtain. None of these are things that I would have considered doing a few weeks ago. Now, I feel compelled to do it in order to protect and exercise my 2nd amendment right.